(1) University of East Anglia researcher Chris Panter said that if ash trees suffer large scale declines, 60 of the country's rarest insect species could be at risk of being lost from Britain.
(2) Yes you do, Beca but in the context of a tent full of nervous, aproned panters, you look quite normal.
(3) Some 80 common insects and 60 of the rarest beetles and flies have an association with ash trees, according to Chris Panter at the University of East Anglia.
(4) Examination of two-dimensional gels showed hypohaptoglobinemia in several seizure patients [Panter et al, 1984].
Santer
Definition:
(v. i.) See Saunter.
Example Sentences:
(1) Many would see this as somewhat over the top, but given Santer's past experiences, it is at least understandable.
(2) It was the assertion of a "balance of evidence" that Santer added.
(3) Indeed it is striking that people with a limited scientific involvement with CRU who have been victims of past attacks – such as Kevin Trenberth of the US government's National Centre for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and Ben Santer of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory – became regular email correspondents with Jones and his colleagues.
(4) It accused Santer of "scientific cleansing" — a reference to the ethnic cleansing then going on in the Balkans.
(5) In the world of science, Santer's team had the last word.
(6) Santer says he saw "serious scientific flaws" in the paper and recommended that the journal reject it.
(7) At least one senior colleague and co-author on the paper in question thought Santer would be best advised to hand over the data.
(8) One man who has battled against climate sceptics longer than most is the climate modeller Ben Santer, who completed his PhD in climate science at the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in the 1983 before going to the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California.
(9) Santer, for instance, concluded in one email in 2008 that McIntyre "has no interest in rational scientific discourse.
(10) Santer fights freedom of information request In November 2008, Santer believed he was being dragged back into the front line, when he received an freedom of information request from sceptic Stephen McIntyre.
(11) Santer told me the words were added to his chapter late, and without full consultation.
(12) Critics point to a section of an earlier draft of the chapter that was deleted by Santer at this stage.
(13) Santer buttonholed Jones's colleague at CRU, Tim Osborn, a member of the editorial board of the journal.
(14) Hero or villain, his data wars with Mann, Jones, Briffa and Santer largely created the siege mentality among the scientists, set them on a path of opposition to freedom of information, and by drawing in scores of data liberationists inside and outside the science community, almost certainly inspired whoever stole and released the emails.
(15) Santer wrote in an email on 3 December 2008 to Tom Wigley: "I'm damned and publicly vilified because I refused to provide McIntyre with the data he requested.... Had I acceded, I am convinced I would have spent years of my scientific career dealing with demands for further explanations, additional data, Fortran codes [a programming language] etc... For the remainder of my scientific career I'd like to dictate my own research agenda."
(16) This finding is in complete agreement with the previous report that human neuroblastoma cell lines contained an unusually large proportion of metabolically incorporated L-[3H]fucose in this specific linkage (U. V. Santer and M. C. Glick, Cancer Res., 43:4159-4166, 1983).
(17) But such a rule puts the scientists in a difficult position, and Santer had the unenviable job of rewording his chapter to reflect the wording of the political summary.
(18) With the Santer paper published, McIntyre weighed in.
(19) They complained in the American Thinker in December 2009 about a surreptitious strategy involving the authors of the paper and the editors of the journal of "delaying [our paper] and not allowing [us] to have a simultaneous response to Santer et al."
(20) Osborn noted to Santer of their discussion the next day : "The only thing I didn't want to make more generally known was the suggestion that print publication of Douglass et al.